No entity without identity - Revision history

Dbalzer: /* Where philosophers can help */

2011-07-01T20:12:08Z

‎Where philosophers can help

Dbalzer: /* Where philosophers can help */

2011-05-13T14:54:27Z

‎Where philosophers can help

Dbalzer: /* Where philosophers can help */ typo

2011-04-04T20:25:35Z

‎Where philosophers can help: typo

Dbalzer: /* Where philosophers can help */

2011-04-04T20:24:53Z

‎Where philosophers can help

Dbalzer at 20:19, 4 April 2011

2011-04-04T20:19:43Z

Dbalzer at 16:41, 4 April 2011

2011-04-04T16:41:58Z

Dbalzer at 16:20, 4 April 2011

2011-04-04T16:20:36Z

Dbalzer: Created page with "==Where philosophers can help== Any statement about something must '''identify''' the thing in question. Introducing '''description levels''' into metadata also means introducin..."

2011-04-04T16:09:33Z

Created page with "==Where philosophers can help== Any statement about something must '''identify''' the thing in question. Introducing '''description levels''' into metadata also means introducin..."

New page

==Where philosophers can help==

Any statement about something must '''identify''' the thing in question. Introducing '''description levels''' into metadata also means introducing different concepts of identity.

{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
|-
| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Jazzgossen-rels-id.png|400px]] 

Graph based on information from the Swedish Film Database


| valign="top" width="405px" |
In the relationship graph from the preceding session we identified instances of Cinematographic Work by a '''title''', and instances of Agent by a '''name'''.

As databases grow, titles and names can quickly '''become ambiguous''', while machines require unambigous indentifiers for operating on relationships. Moreover, in this example we have an instance of an Event entity, for which no "natural" identifier exists.
|}

{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
|-
| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Imdb-agentname.png|400px]] 

From: Internet Movie Database, http://www.imdb.com/ accessed 13-Oct-2010


| valign="top" width="405px" |
For many years, the creators of the Internet Movie Database (and also those of Wikipedia) believed that all things of interest could be '''identified uniquely''' and persistently by a name, a title, or similar.

This identifier scheme turned out to be difficult to manage as the databases grew in size.

In recent years, both databases have introduced '''non-semantic identifiers''' in the form of numbering schemes that remain hidden from the user interface.
|}

{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
|-
| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Zensurkarte.jpg|400px]] 



| valign="top" width="405px" |
No bureaucracy without identifiers.

An identifier such as "58981" can only be '''unique within a''' particular '''scope''', in this case, the set of German film censorship records.

In databases, the scope of an identifier is usually limited to an entity from the data model. In this way, different entities can share the same set of identifiers, e.g. a Cinematographic Work 12345 can be distinguished from an Agent 12345.

In the Linked Open Data paradigm, the scope of an identifier is determined by a '''namespace'''. All UniformResource Identifiers (URIs) must contain a component that identifies a namespace.
|}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 13 May 2011
Line 106:		Line 106:

	Such assessments of identity cannot be made on the basis of a metadata standard alone.		Such assessments of identity cannot be made on the basis of a metadata standard alone.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| width="810px" style="background-color:#F0F0F0" \|
		+	References and Materials: Identity and identifiers
		+	* [http://www.athenaeurope.org/getFile.php?id=779 Persistent Identifiers (PIDs): Recommendations for Institutions.] <i>- A useful guideline from the ATHENA project, April 2011</i>
	\|}		\|}

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 4 April 2011
Line 106:		Line 106:

	Such assessments of identity cannot be made on the basis of a metadata standard alone.		Such assessments of identity cannot be made on the basis of a metadata standard alone.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| height="20px" width="100%"
		+	\|- style="text-align:center; "
		+	\|<span style="color:#808080"> • Previous: [[Relationships: An essential component of art and culture]] • Up: [[TC 372 Workshop Compendium\|Contents]] • Next: [[Description levels: A worked example]] • </span>
		+	\|-
	\|}		\|}

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 4 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	''From the [[TC 372 Workshop Compendium]]''
		+
	==Where philosophers can help==		==Where philosophers can help==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:41, 4 April 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Levels or '''modes of identity''' have been (and continue to be) a major topic of analytical philosophy.		Levels or '''modes of identity''' have been (and continue to be) a major topic of analytical philosophy.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|[[File:Gabeln.jpg\|400px]]<br />
		+	<span style="font-size:8pt">
		+	Photos and montage: Detlev Balzer, 2010
		+	</span>
		+
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|
		+	'''Levels of identity''' can be distinguished in every kitchen.
		+
		+	On the left, we have an '''item''' which, by definition, can only be identical with itself. In the center, we have two items that are identical at the '''manifestation''' level, i.e. these forks were apparently manufactured from the same mould. On the right we have two items from different manifestations that are identical at a generic '''concept''' level, i.e. both can be identified as forks.
		+
		+	We could easily extend this example with a fourth level, e.g. pieces of cutlery belonging to a named series from a particular designer.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|[[File:Quine-citation.png\|400px]]<br />
		+	<span style="font-size:8pt">
		+	</span>
		+
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|
		+	Questions of identity have often been the subject of drama, one of the best known examples being ''Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde''.
		+
		+	In the context of filmography, similar questions arise when film works are modified to an extent that the '''level of identity''' needs to be assessed.
		+
		+	Such assessments of identity cannot be made on the basis of a metadata standard alone.
	\|}		\|}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 4 April 2011
Line 45:		Line 45:

	In the Linked Open Data paradigm, the scope of an identifier is determined by a '''namespace'''. All UniformResource Identifiers (URIs) must contain a component that identifies a namespace.		In the Linked Open Data paradigm, the scope of an identifier is determined by a '''namespace'''. All UniformResource Identifiers (URIs) must contain a component that identifies a namespace.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|[[File:Dif-guid-1.png\|400px]]<br />
		+	<span style="font-size:8pt">
		+	From the in-house database of Deutsches Filminstitut, Frankfurt am Main
		+	</span>
		+
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|
		+	This is an identifier from the DIF database which uses '''globally unique identifiers (GUIDs)''' for all instances of all entities.
		+
		+	GUIDs are numbers with 128 binary places (38 decimal places) which are constructed in such a way that the chance of two computers generating the same ID is extremely small, even over long periods of time.
		+
		+	GUIDs are particularly useful in environments where data is created without centralised control.
		+	\|}
		+
		+	{\| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
		+	\|-
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|[[File:Frbr-model-1.png\|400px]]<br />
		+	<span style="font-size:8pt">
		+	From: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. IFLA UBCIM Publications – New Series Vol 19. München: K.G. Saur, 1998
		+	</span>
		+
		+	\| valign="top" width="405px" \|
		+	Identity (expressed through identifiers) plays a major role in interpreting the FRBR description layers.
		+
		+	Two '''items''' can only '''share an identity''' at the '''manifestation''' level. Likewise, two '''manifestations''' can only share an identical '''expression''', etc.
		+
		+	Levels or '''modes of identity''' have been (and continue to be) a major topic of analytical philosophy.
	\|}		\|}

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 No bureaucracy without identifiers.
-An identifier such as "58981" can only be '''unique within a''' particular '''scope''', in this case, the set of German film censorship records.
+An identifier such as "58981" can only be '''unique within a''' particular '''scope'''. In this case, the scope is the set of censorship records from the German ''Filmprüfstelle'' in Berlin.
 In databases, the scope of an identifier is usually limited to an entity from the data model. In this way, different entities can share the same set of identifiers, e.g. a Cinematographic Work 12345 can be distinguished from an Agent 12345.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 In the relationship graph from the preceding session we identified instances of Cinematographic Work by a '''title''', and instances of Agent by a '''name'''.
-As databases grow, titles and names can quickly '''become ambiguous''', while machines require unambigous indentifiers for operating on relationships. Moreover, in this example we have an instance of an Event entity, for which no "natural" identifier exists.
+As databases grow, titles and names can quickly '''become ambiguous''', while machines require unambiguous indentifiers for operating on relationships. Moreover, in this example we have an instance of an Event entity, for which no "natural" identifier exists.
 |}