Where to look for suitable vocabularies - Revision history

Dbalzer at 08:41, 23 October 2011

2011-10-23T08:41:43Z

Dbalzer at 21:53, 12 June 2011

2011-06-12T21:53:57Z

Dbalzer at 21:11, 12 June 2011

2011-06-12T21:11:52Z

Dbalzer at 11:38, 12 June 2011

2011-06-12T11:38:33Z

Dbalzer: moved Where to look for suitable element vocabularies to Where to look for suitable vocabularies

2011-06-12T08:45:19Z

moved Where to look for suitable element vocabularies to Where to look for suitable vocabularies

Dbalzer at 08:10, 12 June 2011

2011-06-12T08:10:40Z

Dbalzer at 08:01, 12 June 2011

2011-06-12T08:01:47Z

Dbalzer at 07:20, 25 April 2011

2011-04-25T07:20:06Z

Dbalzer at 07:12, 25 April 2011

2011-04-25T07:12:08Z

Dbalzer at 06:24, 12 April 2011

2011-04-12T06:24:21Z

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 * [http://metadataregistry.org/vocabulary/list.html The Open Metadata Registry vocabulary collection]
 * [http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ EBU metadata coding schemes download page]
-* [http://www.schemaweb.info/default.aspx SchemaWeb: A directory of RDF-based schemas and vocabularies]
+* [http://schema.org/docs/full.html schema.org: A collection of markup vocabularies from the major search engine providers]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
 |-
-| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Efg-type-vocs.png|400px]]<br />
+| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Efg-type-vocs.jpg|400px]]<br />
 <span style="font-size:8pt">
 </span>
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |}
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 In a syntax definition (also known as ''grammar''), each element denotes a class of vocabulary items. In cases where the element has the syntactical role of a noun or adjective, this class will be referred to as '''type vocabulary'''. If the class members are expected to be verbs or verb phrases (including all constructs containing the verb ''to be''), then we speak of a '''relationship vocabulary'''. And finally, where the element denotes a class of ''named entities'' (e.g. persons, product names, etc.), we use the term '''name authority file''', a concept borrowed from librarianship.
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
@@ Line 14: / Line 27: @@
 * [http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ EBU metadata coding schemes download page]
 * [http://www.schemaweb.info/default.aspx SchemaWeb: A directory of RDF-based schemas and vocabularies]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Strictly speaking, '''even a metadata schema''' such as EN 15907 '''is a vocabulary'''. It provides us with names and definitions of entities. In addition, it defines ways in which these entities can be combined in order to create meaningful statements. This is its role as a '''syntax definition'''.
-In a syntax definition (also known as ''grammar''), each element denotes a class of vocabulary items. In cases where the element has the syntactical role of a noun or adjective, this class will be referred to as '''element vocabulary'''. If the class members are expected to be verbs or verb phrases (including all constructs containing the verb ''to be''), then we speak of a '''relationship vocabulary'''. And finally, where the element denotes a class of ''named entities'' (e.g. persons, product names, etc.), we use the term '''name authority file''', a concept borrowed from librarianship.
+In a syntax definition (also known as ''grammar''), each element denotes a class of vocabulary items. In cases where the element has the syntactical role of a noun or adjective, this class will be referred to as '''type vocabulary'''. If the class members are expected to be verbs or verb phrases (including all constructs containing the verb ''to be''), then we speak of a '''relationship vocabulary'''. And finally, where the element denotes a class of ''named entities'' (e.g. persons, product names, etc.), we use the term '''name authority file''', a concept borrowed from librarianship.
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 * [http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ EBU metadata coding schemes download page]
 * [http://www.schemaweb.info/default.aspx SchemaWeb: A directory of RDF-based schemas and vocabularies]
 Selected vocabularies

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Strictly speaking, '''even a metadata schema''' such as EN 15907 '''is a vocabulary'''. It provides us with names and definitions of entities. In addition, it defines ways in which these entities can be combined in order to create meaningful statements. This is its role as a '''syntax definition'''.
-In a syntax definition (also known as ''grammar''), each element denotes a class of vocabulary items. In cases where the element has the syntactical role of a noun or adjective, we speak of '''element vocabularies'''. Where the class members are expected to be verbs or verb phrases (including all constructs containing the verb ''to be''), we speak of '''relationship vocabularies'''. And finally, where the element denotes a class of ''named entities'' (e.g. persons, product names, etc.), we speak of '''name authority files''', a term borrowed from librarianship.
+In a syntax definition (also known as ''grammar''), each element denotes a class of vocabulary items. In cases where the element has the syntactical role of a noun or adjective, this class will be referred to as '''element vocabulary'''. If the class members are expected to be verbs or verb phrases (including all constructs containing the verb ''to be''), then we speak of a '''relationship vocabulary'''. And finally, where the element denotes a class of ''named entities'' (e.g. persons, product names, etc.), we use the term '''name authority file''', a concept borrowed from librarianship.
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:45, 12 June 2011
(No difference)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ''From the [[TC 372 Workshop Compendium]]''
-Content for this section has not yet been decided upon. Some input is expected from the Copenhagen workshop session on 15-Apr-2011.
+Strictly speaking, '''even a metadata schema''' such as EN 15907 '''is a vocabulary'''. It provides us with names and definitions of entities. In addition, it defines ways in which these entities can be combined in order to create meaningful statements. This is its role as a '''syntax definition'''.
 {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 * [http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/ MARC Source Codes for Vocabularies, Rules, and Schemes]
 * [http://metadataregistry.org/vocabulary/list.html The Open Metadata Registry vocabulary collection]
-* [http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ EBU metadata classification schemes download page]
+* [http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ EBU metadata coding schemes download page]
 * [http://www.schemaweb.info/default.aspx SchemaWeb: A directory of RDF-based schemas and vocabularies]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * [http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-emotion-voc-20110407/ W3C EmotionML: a candidate for content description?]
 * [http://data.linkedmdb.org/directory/personal_film_appearance_type Example of a type vocabulary in the Linked Movie Database]
 |}